KNOWLEDGE

A critical reminder of the intricate relationships between land ownership, cooperative societies, and state acquisition for public projects as Members of a Cooperative Housing Society, who had purchased land from the from the Society and carried out construction thereon, enjoying long peaceful possession whereof, have not only lost their land but also were declared disentitled for any compensation in the event of the acquisition of the land for planned development i.e., Metro Rail Project. Brief Factual Background The suit property… Read More »OWNERSHIP DISPUTE AND COMPENSATION CLAIM ON LAND BY THE MEMBERS OF A COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, WHICH LAND IS ACQUIRED FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.

**Unraveling Inheritance Laws: A Deep Dive into Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma Judgment** **Introduction** In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India delivered a significant ruling on inheritance laws in the case of Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma. The verdict, announced on August 11, 2020, brought substantial changes to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, addressing the gender disparity in property rights. This case marked a pivotal moment in Indian jurisprudence, reshaping traditional notions of inheritance and gender equality. **Background**… Read More »UNRAVELING THE INHERITANCE LAWS

Introduction In the realm of legal proceedings, the proper verification and institution of a plaint hold significant importance. A plaint is a formal written statement submitted by a plaintiff to initiate a civil lawsuit against a defendant. Its verification is a crucial step in ensuring the authenticity and veracity of the claims made in the plaint. This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of verification and the process of instituting a plaint, shedding light on their significance in the… Read More »Understanding ‘Verification’ and ‘Institution’ of ‘Plaint’ in Legal Proceedings

In the context of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the terms “venue” and “seat” are essential concepts related to the conduct and validity of arbitration proceedings. These terms help determine the geographical location where an arbitration takes place and the legal framework governing the arbitration process. The distinction between the two terms is crucial as it can have significant implications for the arbitration proceedings. Venue: The “venue” refers to the physical location where the arbitration hearings and other proceedings take… Read More »Understanding “venue” and “seat” in the context of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

The Golaknath case refers to a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India in 1967. The full name of the case is “Golaknath and Ors. v. State of Punjab,” and it is officially known as Golaknath v. State of Punjab (AIR 1967 SC 1643). In this case, the Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act, 1964, and the Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1971, both of which sought to curtail the scope of fundamental… Read More »Golaknath Case: A critical chapter in Indian Constitutional history.

The Golaknath case initially held that the Parliament did not have the authority to amend any part of the Constitution, including fundamental rights. However, in a subsequent landmark case, Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), the Supreme Court modified the Golaknath ruling. In Kesavananda Bharati, the court upheld the doctrine of basic structure but clarified that while Parliament had wide powers to amend the Constitution, it could not alter its basic structure. The exact components of the basic structure… Read More »WHAT IS THE DOCTRINE OF THE’BASIC STRUCTURE’?